Authored by KC Bhuyan
Abstract
The present analysis was based on data related to knowledge about health hazard of tobacco smoking of a group of students. The data were collected from 798 students of American International University-Bangladesh during the academic session 2012-2013. Around 87% of the investigated students were high in awareness of health hazard of tobacco smoking but still 32.3% students were smokers. There was none who was low in awareness. The awareness had been measured by 20 items. Though most of the students were highly aware of the problem still a good number of them were smokers. Thus, a question, naturally, arose whether measure of awareness was reliable. In this paper, reliability measure had been done by Cronbach’s alpha [1]. The value of α is 0.94 indicating that the evaluation of knowledge of health hazard of tobacco smoking was excellent. Reliability had also been measured by Spearman-Brown formula and the value of the coefficient was 0.92.Keywords: Awareness of health hazard of tobacco smoking; Smokers; Reliability of measure of awareness; Spearman-brown formula for reliability; Cronbach’s alpha
Introduction
Reliability in statistics and psychometrics is the overall consistency of a measure where measure is done by different rater. It is related to test and deals with consistency, precision, repeatability, trustworthiness [2]. A measure is said to have a high reliability if it produces similar results under consistent condition.Consistency is of two types, viz. (a) absolute consistency which concerns with consistency of scores of individuals, (b) relative consistency which concerns with the consistency of the positions or ranks of individuals in the group [3,4]. This means that reliability is a property of scores of a measure when the measure is done using several items, qualitative or quantitative, especially in the field of education, psychology, health science and even in business.
The reliability is measured by a coefficient which provides the information about the dependability of the measurement by a number of ranges from 0 to 1. The reliability coefficient is given by
There are different measures of reliability. One of the measures has been done by Spearman- Brown formula [5]. Other measures of reliability were suggested by many eminent statisticians, notable among them are Cochran, Cohen, Cronbach, Kudar and Richardson, Guttman, Michael, Olga, Maxwell Chakrabarty [6-14]. Chakrabarty suggested the split-half method of measuring coefficient of reliability using Spearman-Brown formula with a modified approach.
However, due to different proposed measure, reliability of a test may vary from one sample to another [15]. According to the variation in measure, a test is excellently reliable if its coefficient is 0.90+; Cronbach’s [8] reliability is good if coefficient ranges from 0.80 to 0.90. The test does not contribute if the coefficient becomes 0.50 or less.
The objective of the present study was to evaluate how much reliable was the measure of awareness of youth regarding health hazard of tobacco smoking. Because, in a separate study, it was reported that youth who were more aware of the problem of health hazard of tobacco smoking, a good number of them was smokers. As was expected the more awareness of the problem would lead to less smokers in percentage [16]. Otherwise, the evaluation of awareness would not be reliable. The reliability measure would indicate whether youth are really aware of the problem. In a separate study among the students in abroad it was reported that a good number of students were aware of the problem but rate of smokers was not less [17]. So, naturally, a question was arisen whether measure of awareness was reliable. Though such study was not reported earlier, we made an attempt to study the reliability of the measure of awareness. Because, if the measure of awareness is reliable and still higher proportion of youth are smokers, alternative way needs to be suggested to discourage the youth so that they avoid smoking.
Methodology
The data was collected from 798 randomly selected students of American International University-Bangladesh during academic session summer 2012-13. During the session there were in total 11009 students. They were registered in sections of a course. In each section, the number of students is approximately 40 and classes of all faculties run at the same time.It was decided to provide the pre-tested questionnaires to the students of a section of different faculties attending the classes at a time so that no student gets questionnaire twice or more.
The questionnaire was provided to the students covering 10% of each faculty and they were requested to return the filled in questionnaires to their respective teachers in the subsequent class/ classes. However, the filled in questionnaires were returned by 798 students. The analytical results of the data collected from 798 students had been reported in a separate paper and the present analysis was based on the evaluation of awareness of health hazard of tobacco smoking expressed in the paper [16].
There were 20 questions to evaluate awareness of health hazard. Each question had closed answers like ‘True’, ‘False’ and ‘Don’t Know’. The affirmative answer towards health hazard of tobacco smoking was assigned ‘3’ followed by ‘2’ with less awareness. The number ‘1’ is assigned for negative answer towards awareness. The maximum score, as was expected, for high level of awareness was 60 and for low level of awareness the total score was 20. Khatun and Bhuyan had classified the students as highly aware (total score 40+), medium in awareness (total score 30-40) and low in awareness (total score <30). Among the sample students 697 were highly aware of the problem and 101 were medium in awareness. In other papers, it was reported that smoking habit and awareness were significantly associated indicating that lower proportion (32.3%) of highly aware students were smokers [18,19].
In spite of high level of awareness among majority (87.3%) of the students, a good number of students were smokers. As higher proportion of respondents were aware, the much lower could be the proportion of smokers. But the incidence of smoking was not so lower compared to that in general [16]. Thus, a question, naturally, arose whether the evaluation of the awareness was reliable or not. In this paper, the reliability of measure of awareness of health hazard of smoking was studied by Cronbach LJ [1] alpha, where the Cronbach’s alpha is given by
xi = the score of i-th item,
ơxi2= the variance of scores of i-th item,
ơy2= variance of y. Reliability had also been measured by Spearman-Brown formula, where splitting of tests were done by iterative methods proposed by Chakrabarty SN [2]. The formula for reliability coefficient is R= , where r is the correlation coefficient of test of results of 1st and 2nd half.
Results and Discussion
The descriptive statistics of xi for different items were shown in
Table1. Item1[Smoking cigarettes can cause health disorders], 2[The
smoking persons possibly gets cough and rhinorrhea] and 7 [The
number of inhaled cigarettes in a day is a factor that influences lung
cancer incidence.] were evaluated more homogeneously compared
to other items as the variances in the measurement of these 3
items were lowest compared to the variances of measurement of
other items. Item 18 [Smokers can quit smoking easily whenever
they wish] was measured more heterogeneously as the variance of
measurement of this item was 0.808. The variance of y values was
ơy2=91.522 and hence the Cronbach’s alpha was found as α=0.94
indicating that the evaluation of knowledge about health hazard of
tobacco smoking was excellently reliable.
Please follow the URL to access more information about this article
https://irispublishers.com/oajap/fulltext/on-reliability-in-evaluating-the-awareness-of-health-hazard-of-tobacco-smoking-of-a-group-bangladeshi-students.ID.000526.php
To know more about our Journals... Iris Publishers
To know about Open Access publisher
No comments:
Post a Comment