Saturday, January 30, 2021

Iris Publishers- Open access Journal of Urology & Nephrology | New Treatment New Complication – Mini Review

 



Authored by Ákos Géza Pethő*

Abstract

Nephrotoxicity caused by medication could limit the treatment success. In multiple malignancies are playing crucial role the anti-cancer drugs which have well known nephrotoxicity. Using the conventional chemotherapies acute kidney injury could develop but not in all patients who are suffering cancers. In these patients will acute tubulointerstitial nephritis or rarely nephrotic syndrome occur. The onco-pharmacology is an intensively investigated field. In the recent decade’s novel therapies founded. The new treatments in oncology have more targeted affect on cancer cells. These drugs will be modifying the whole immune system with the fine balance between cancer surveillance and preserving self-tolerance. The immune checkpoint inhibitors have superior anti-cancer therapeutic affect but new, until unknown complication raised. In this mini review we will discuss the most acute kidney injuries during chemotherapy.

Keywords: Cancer; Chemotherapy; Immune system; Immune checkpoint inhibitors

Introduction

Nephrotoxicity caused by medication could limit the treatment success. In malignancies the conventional chemotherapeutic medications could cause acute or chronic kidney injury. The mechanism of the kidney injury is nontargeted cell killing with the possibility of the injure the renal microvasculature, glomerulus, tubular segments, and renal interstitial [1]. The clinical syndrome that caused by those conventional chemotherapeutic drugs could be various, e.g. acute kidney injury, proteinuria–hematuria, the nephrotic syndrome, isolated tubulopathies (with accompanying electrolyte and acid–base disturbances), hypertension, and chronic kidney disease [2]. Beyond these conventional chemotherapeutic medications novel cell specific immunotherapies were developed. Oncologists have used immunotherapies since the 1980s and 1990s. The first immunotherapies used were exogenous cytokines, such as IFN-α [3]. From this point intensively research was started, the anti-cancer therapies will have advanced further by intensifying the immune response [4]. The immunotherapies will fine balance between cancer surveillance and preserving self-tolerance. This novel immunotherapy known as immune checkpoints inhibitors. The modulation of the immune system is dependent on the complex interplay between multiple immune system components. In the pathway of the immune system respond playing rolecytotoxic, helper, and regulatory T cells; macrophages; natural killer cells; and myeloid-derived suppressor cells. By the respond of thy immune system is the most important point; the balance between a hyperactive immune response resulting in immune-mediated damage to healthy tissues and a hypoactive immune response resulting in infections and malignancies is achieved through a redundant and multilevel regulation of lymphocyte cytotoxic activity through immune checkpoint inhibition [5]. The novel immunotherapies have new side effects. Off-target inflammatory responses to checkpoint inhibitors are commonly referred to as immune-related adverse effects (irAEs).

Conventional Chemotherapies

Not all patients exposed to nephrotoxic chemotherapeutic agents develop kidney injury, suggesting the presence of severalc factors that enhance patient risk for nephrotoxicity. Most common is acute tubular injury or necrosis due to treatment with platinumcontaining regimens, ifosfamide, oledronic acid, pemetrexed, and numerous other chemotherapeutic agents [1]. But not only the renal tubulointerstitial and well known tubulopathy could occur. Some drugs could affect intraglomerular, causing focal and segmental glomerulosclerosis and minimal change disease, which promotes a form of drug-induced podocytopathy. ss such as pamidronate are widely used in the treatment of patients with lytic bony lesions secondary to breast cancer or multiple myeloma. Pamidronate causes a collapsing variety of FSGS [6]. Bisphosphonates have been associated with deterioration of renal function and histopathological changes in the kidney. Drug-related side effects are limiting factors to the use of bisphosphonates. Available data suggest that pamidronate and zolidronate, but not ibandronate, are associated with nephrotoxicity in the treatment of patients with malignant disease [7]. Other drug-induced forms of acute kidney injury include obstructive and inflammatory interstitial injury resulting from intratubular crystal precipitation induced by methotrexate and interstitial nephritis from various chemotherapeutic agents [8].

IFN-α Therapy

IFN-α was Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved to treat CML in 1981 followed by hairy cell leukemia, AIDS-related Kaposi sarcoma, metastatic melanoma, and follicular non-Hodgkin lymphoma. IFN-α will enhances the effect or T cell–mediated responses, with cytokine release, e.g. IL-12 secretion, via several signaling events [9]. By IFN-α treatment could occur minimal change disease (MCD) or FSGS, which are manifestations of podocyte injury. Sometimes thrombotic microangiopathy (TMA) is the clinical symptom after administering of IFN-α, which reflects vascular endothelial damage [10].

Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors

The immune checkpoint inhibitors are more interesting field of anti-cancer drugs. Enhancing or suppressing T cell activation via costimulatory or coinhibitorymolecules modifies effector T cell response. Cytotoxic lymphocyte–associated antigen-4 (CTLA- 4) and programmed cell death protein-1 (PD-1) are two receptors that play an important role in negatively regulating T cell activation and function [11]. The most important effect of those receptors. that ligand binding to CTLA-4 and PD-1 receptors modifies the immune system response to antigens by inhibiting T cell activation. The inhibition of the T-cells allows the immunologic self-tolerance and prevents autoimmunity. Administration of immune checkpoint inhibitors could various of adverse autoimmune effects appear, e.g. dermatitis, colitis, pneumonitis, endocrinopathies. The incidence of IRAEs range from 15% to 90%, with severe IRAEsranging from 0.5% to 13% [12,13]. The mechanism of CPI-induced kidney injury is unknown, but CPI therapy in patients with kidney transplants could develop rejection. Because of this major side effect of CPI oncologist should consider the anti-cancer therapy in kidney transplanted patients [14]. The anti-CTLA4 drug (ipilimumab) in some cases caused minimal-change disease and interstitial nephritis. The ipilimumab has been described as causing acute kidney injury from interstitial nephritis as well as lupus nephritis, too [15]. Pathology revealed acute interstitial nephritis in most cases with varying degrees of foot process effacement. Most of the AKI occurred 6–12 weeks following the start of treatment, with the longest interval being 26 weeks [16]. Programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) play a crucial role in anti-cancer immunity, too. Monoclonal antibodies against PD-1 (nivolumab and pembrolizumab) andPD-L1 (atezolizumab) are currently used for the treatment of advanced stage cancers. Acute tubulointerstitial nephritis is an important manifestation of kidney injury associated with the use of anti-PD-1 drugs [17]. Nivolumab, a monoclonal anti-PD1 antibody can cause autoimmune glomerulonephritis as well as tubulointerstitial injury. The immune-related nephritis generally responded well to systemic corticosteroid treatment [18]. The oncologist almost uses combination therapy with ipilimumab and nivolumab. The combination therapy appears to increase the incidence and severity of adverse events as compared to the use of nivolumab alone [19].

To read more about this article....Open access Journal of Urology & Nephrology 

Please follow the URL to access more information about this article

To know more about our Journals....Iris Publishers

To know about Open Access Publishers

Thursday, January 28, 2021

Iris Publishers- Open access Journal of Nutrition & Food Science | Effect of Parboiling Technique on the Nutritional Quality of Rice

 


Authored by Niyonshima Alexandre*

Abstract

Rice (Oryza sativa) is among the seven crops of priorities in Rwanda that play a role in food security within household. Different varieties of rice both short and long are grown in Rwanda, among them Zong zeng, Yune Eritian and XY are grown and consumed in almost all parts of the country. The same for other crops, a huge amount of rice produced is lost during handling activities before reaching the consumer. The loss includes breakage, and loss of nutrients due to the removal of bran and husk. Different techniques are used for the reduction of such post-harvest losses of rice and rice parboiling is among the most useful techniques applied to reduce postharvest losses of rice and is now applied in different parts of the world. However, this technique has not yet been adopted by Rwandans for prevention of loss of rice after harvesting. Therefore, the objective of the present study was to assess the effects of parboiling technique on physico-chemical parameters of different rice varieties grown in Rwanda and to do its awareness for Rwandan population. Three new varieties: Zong Zeng, Yune Eritian, and XY were further prepared and analysed in comparing with the same rice varieties that is not parboiled. Paddy was weighed, cleaned 3 times, pre-steamed, soaked in water of 80 0C at ratio of 1: 2.5 in water bath set at 800C for 4 and 6 hours, and then the steaming was done for 10 min at 100 0C. Drying followed in order to reduce the moisture content using the dryer set at (20-25°C) and the the final moisture content was13%. Dried rice was then milled in a mortar by use of a pestle to remove husks. Nutritional analysis was done by measuring Ash, protein, fat and Vitamin B1. The findings of the present study show that parboiling resulted in increase of Fat, Vitamin B1, Protein and Ash content. 4 hours soaking time showed effect on the acceptability as the rice soaked for 4hours has been more accepted compared to the one soaked for 6 hours. 6 hours soaking time resulted in considerable increase of B1 compared to other used soaking times. Therefore, we can conclude that parboiling method is a good method for reduction of rice lost during rice processors and fighting against diseases such as beriberi caused by deficiency of Vitamin B1 due to its associated increase in B1.

Keywords: Zong Zeng; Yune Eritian; XY parboiling; Steaming; Vitamin B1.

Abbrevations: ANOVA: Analysis of Variance; CAVM: College of Agriculture, Animal Sciences and Veterinary Medicine; FAO: Food Agricultural Organization; G: Grams; MINAGRI: Ministry of Agriculture and Animal Resources; MINICOM: Ministry of Trade and Industry; MT: Metric Tones; NISR: National Institute of Statistics Rwanda; %: percentage; RCA: Rwanda Cooperative Agency; RDB: Rwanda Development Board; UR: University of Rwanda; YE: Yune Eritian; ZZ: Zong Zeng

Introduction

Background

Rwanda has a surface area of 26338km2 and the population in 2012 the total resident population was 10,515,973 inhabitants (NISR, 2014). Rwanda is a mountainous country with high land and flooded valley. As a result, the temperatures are generally low. An nual average temperatures range from 15 to 25 degree centigrade. Temperatures are much lower in lowlands producing areas. Rwanda has also about 165 000 ha of marshes of which 66 000 ha can be developed into rice fields, currently about 12 000 ha are irrigated. Rice is almost exclusively grown in marshlands at an altitude of 800 to 1200 m above the mean sea levels over two seasons; wet season (A) (March-August) and dry season (B) (September-January) (A Kathiresan, 2013).

Rice is a cereal crop from poaceae (graminiae) family with a scientific name of Oryza sativa, rice is categorized into two categories which Japonica (short and bold type) and Indica (long type). Rice was introduced in Rwanda in 1950s through various missions from China and Korea. After the initial success of growing rice in the valleys near Kigali and in the Southern province, a number of varieties became popular in 1960s. These varieties collectively referred to as Kigoli, are of short and bold type. In Bugarama, government introduced rice varieties from India such as Basmati 370 in 1980s (A Kathiresan, 2013). In 2012, the cultivation of rice covered 14,701 ha and results in the production of 81,908 MT of rice. It was expected that in 2018, the average productivity of 5.8 tons/Ha with a maximum of 7 tons/Ha, the cultivation area of 28,500 ha will be covered (RDB, 2017).

Due to the agricultural factors such as fertile soil, favorable weather, natural water resources, and efficient manpower make Rwanda highly suitable for rice cultivation. Furthermore, rice is preferred due to its long shelf-life, ease of cooking and transportation. Today, rice is selected as priority commodities according to MINAGRI in 2004 and has become a popular choice of food in schools, homes, restaurants, and public programs in Rwanda. For human being societies in different corners of the world. The rising incomes, growing urban population, and changing lifestyles have further aggravated the demand for rice. In response to this growing trend, the Government of Rwanda has identified rice as a priority crop since 2002. The national rice policy aimed at enhancing the productivity levels and raising the standard of post-harvest processing of rice was also developed. The vision was that Rwanda will attain self- sufficiency in rice production in the next 12 years and will be well- positioned to compete local and regional market with significant improvement in quality and value. The above policies were recommended aiming to attain the objective such as enhancing the quality of rice grains through improved management practices of harvesting, drying and storage of rice grain and raise the standard of milling operation and there by improve the quality and competitiveness of locally produced rice grains (A Kathiresan, 2010).

The postharvest activities are of great importance in terms of value addition and food losses, in spite of different strategies and programs for increasing of rice production and decrease of the rice postharvest losses is still high mainly due to inappropriate postharvest handling and storage techniques. In the rice value chain, there are several constraints which can decrease the yield during the process. Some of them start at the beginning during the preparation of field. Rice parboiling is a postharvest process carried out on paddy (unhusked) rice. Parboiling has a number of advantages, including the enhancement of the quality and yield of rice at milling and the preservation of nutritional values as parboiled rice has a longer shelf life (due to the deactivation of enzymes) and, because its grains are harder, it stores better and is more resistant to insect pests. The cooking quality of parboiled rice is better in several ways: its grains stay firm, they do not stick together, and it loses less starch during cooking [1]. So, the research will focus on the postharvest losses and how it can be treated by new technology which is parboiling. For human being societies in different corners of the world including Rwanda, rice is prepared in different ways such as boiling, where rice is soaked in 3-4 quart of water for 1 quart of rice, and boil for 15-20 minutes approximately.

In Rwanda, the parboiling technique is not applied, or it affects the nutritional content and other aspects that have been indicated by many researchers such as improvement of flavor that lead the consumer preference and unbreakable of rice grains, reduction of cooking time, etc. The aim of the present study is to apply the parboiling technique for rice preparation and determine its effects on different rice varieties grown in Rwanda.

Problem statement

Rice is a staple food which has a high demand of consumption compared to its production on market, as in 2012 rice consumption compared to other crop was 6.9% where 3.8% was produced (local) and 3.1% was imported, not only inside the country but also outside where in East Africa community the demand of rice is ≥ 2,088,000MT, according to RDB, 2017. Rice when milled is classified into 3types such as heady rice (long grain, medium grain, short grain), rice flour and broken rice grain; the breakage lead to post harvest loss and consumer do not prefer the quality of rice produced.

Different diseases such as beriberi and Wernicke-Korsakoff syndrome which are diseases caused by a deficiency of thiamine (vitamin B1) that affect the nervous system, cause visual impairment, lack of muscle coordination, mental decline, breathing, eye movement, heart function, alertness are caused by lack of vitamin B1 which is likely to be low in white rice as bran which is rich in Thiamine, riboflavin, niacin or nicotinic acid and mineral such as Calcium, Phosphorus, Potassium, Sodium has been removed by the milling and polishing; one of method to acquire all those nutrient is parboiling which refers to the hydrothermal treatment technique called parboiling and such rice will be a parboiled rice which will be rich in all those nutrients. The storage time or the shelf life of a product is so important, and parboiling is one of the ways of reducing the post-harvest losses of rice during storage that can be caused by rodents, insects, and other pests and increasing its storage time as the parboiled rice is very resistant to insect and rodent.

To read more about this article....Open access Journal of Nutrition & Food Science

Please follow the URL to access more information about this article

To know more about our Journals....Iris Publishers

To know about Open Access Publishers

Iris Publishers- Open access Journal of Nutrition & Food Science | Food and Nutrition Trends: Eternal Life or Our Extinction?

 


Authored by Cyril Kanmony J*

Opinion

Pesticides refer to agro-chemicals that are used for protecting plants from pests. Pesticides are classified into insecticidesfungicides, herbicides and others including plant-growth-regulators. Liberal use of agro-chemicals results in the presence of excess pesticide residues in the edible parts of plants and food grains. It is proved by many laboratory-based studies [1]. The indiscriminately sprayed pesticides and insecticides also results in the pollution of air, water and soil. Pollution reduces our life span by increasing our exposure to environment-related health hazards [2,3]. Further due to overuse of these poisonous pesticides and insecticides, these pests and insects become immune to these chemicals and become more dangerous than before. We use these poisonous chemicals to kill the damage-causing pests without knowing their impact on human health. They have the potential to kill not only pests and insects but also various beings including human beings. Why do then we use these poisonous agro-chemicals?

Pests, weeds and diseases destroy crops to the extent of 40% in developing countries. The net impact is a decline in the yield and output. In India, it is estimated at 35% to 45% [4]. Hence it is utmost necessity to control these damage-causing pests and insects to enhance production. But nobody bothers about the residues present in edible parts of plants and food grains that humans consume. A recent report published by All India Network Project on Pesticide Residues finds that residues of pesticides were found in 18.75% of samples tested. These samples include vegetables, cereals, pulses, egg, fish, meat, spices, tea, milk, and surface water. In some samples residues of multiple pesticides have been detected. Even mild doses also result in serious adverse health effects by getting accumulated in our body over a period. The most dangerous matter is that the diseases caused by these pesticides cannot be cured.

In European and other developed countries, all chemicals and bacteria are within the prescribed limit. But in India, there is no monitoring system to regulate the usage of these pesticides and insecticides and Indian farmers are uneducated and so they buy and use many pesticides without consulting field experts. They use them even in the absence of disease symptoms. It results in overusing of these agro-chemicals and consequently the presence of excess amount of pesticide residues in food items. They also use these pesticides carelessly without following the required protective measures as they don’t know the hazardous effects of pesticides. The production and consumption of these agro-chemicals, in India, is continuously increasing due to the patronage of governments though these agro-chemicals and chemical fertilizers were introduced in India only after Green Revolution to increase food production. Hence, the total food production in India increased from 82 million tonnes in 1960-1961 to 176 million tonnes in 1990-1991. The production of grains has reached an all-time high of 281 million tonnes in 2018-2019,

Even the usage of poisonous and hazardous pesticides and insecticides is not regulated. In India, as on 30.08.2016, 275 pesticides were registered for use. Of these 255 are chemical poisons and 115 are highly hazardous (Kumar and Narasimha 2017). In the supply of agro-chemicals, India stood at the 4th place after the US, Japan and China. India’s pesticides industry is the biggest in Asia and 12th in the world. The Ministry of Chemicals and Fertilisers (GOI 2019a) [5] reports show that the production of key pesticides increased from 186,490 MTs in 2014-2015 to 216,703 MTs in 2018-2019. The consumption also increased from 56,121 MTs in 2014-2015 to 62,183 MTs in 2017-2018. But the consumption of these chemicals was only 39,773 MTs in 2005-2006. Of the total pesticides consumed, nearly 70% is consumed by five States, namely: Uttar Pradesh, Maharashtra, Andhra Pradesh, Punjab and Haryana. Crop wise data show that more than 18% of pesticides are used on paddy, the most staple food of Indians and 50% on cotton. On an average, the consumption of pesticides in India is 0.29 kg/ ha. But it is as high as 0.74 kg in Punjab, 0.62 kg in Haryana and 0.57kg in Maharashtra and as low as 0.03 kg in Madhya Pradesh (GOI 2019) [6].

The presence of traces of dangerous pesticides that we use as pest-control chemicals creates many health problems. The most dangerous fact is that the diseases caused by these pesticides cannot be cured. The health problems range from short-term illnesses like headache and nausea to chronic impacts like cancer, reproductive harm and endocrine disruption. Long-term exposure to pesticides also leads to Parkinson’s diseases, asthma, depression and anxiety and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). Children in comparison with adults breathe more air, eat more food and drink more water per unit of body weight and so among all the most vulnerable are children. A recent report points out that since 2005 there has been a general increase of 11% in ADHD, while there has been a 175% increase in cases among children between 3 and 17 years of age. The final consequence of the presence these pesticides in human body is death. It is reported that in developing countries nearly 800,000 people have died due to pesticides since the onset of Green Revolution and every year the death toll due to pesticide consumption through their food is about 2,000. There is also a continuous increase in the disease burden of human beings. Increase in ill-health results in increase in health-related expenditure [7].

It is our duty to keep the environment clear and the world intact for the future generation. The question here arises is: can our crops survive without using or at least without overusing these pesticides and insecticides? The simple answer for the question is: ‘yes’, andour crops can survive without these agro-chemicals. There are different methods to control these pests and insects. Some measures are sustainable and eco-friendly. The best method to stop the use pesticides is organic farming, in which most of the damage-causing pests and insects can be kept away from farms without creating any damage to the environment. For example, in Tamil Nadu, India, Nam Alwar, a perfect organic farmer, solved many problems of farmers without using any pesticide.

To read more about this article....Open access Journal of Nutrition & Food Science

Please follow the URL to access more information about this article

To know more about our Journals....Iris Publishers

To know about Open Access Publishers

Wednesday, January 27, 2021

Iris Publishers- Open access Journal of Public Health & Epidemiology | Challenges in Diagnosis of Cardiovascular Disease in Patients with Diabetes: Reflection to The Last 2019 ESC/EADS Guidelines for Diabetes, Pre-Diabetes and Cardiovascular Diseases

 



Authored by Arif Al Nooryani*

Abstract

With increasing incidence of diabetes mellitus worldwide, particularly in some areas of Middle East where almost 50% of patients presenting with acute coronary syndrome have diabetes mellitus, the question of the best diagnostic approach to detect early coronary artery disease before complications develop are of paramount importance. In this mini review, we present and discuss main recommendations, directions and current issues for diagnosis of cardiovascular diseases according to the new 2019 ESC/EASD Guidelines for diabetes, pre-diabetes and cardiovascular diseases.

Introduction

mellitus (DM), per se, carries at least 2-fold risk for cardiovascular diseases, with some areas in Middle East particularly vulnerable to high prevalence of DM and cardiovascular diseases (CVD) as complication of DM [1]. Although Type2 DM is far more common than Type1 DM, both patients populations carries adverse prognosis, particularly severe in the young onset female patients with Type1 DM, underlying the need for early diagnosis, CDV risk modification, strict adherence to non-drug and drug therapy and systematic follow-up. In fact, patients with known DM and baseline fasting blood glucose of ≥7mmol/L are at highest risk of coronary artery disease (CAD), whereas patients with DM and regulated glucose of <7mmol/L and patients without known DM and fasting blood glucose concentration of ≥7mmol/L carries the same risk for CAD [1]. CVD, particularly cardiac death and myocardial infarction (CAD) accompanied by stroke, is by far most severe complication of DM and diagnostic modalities to address this issue has been discussed by the new ESC/EASD guidelines for diabetes, prediabetes cardiovascular diseases from 2019 [2].

According to the new 2019 ESC/EASD guidelines for diabetes, pre-diabetes and cardiovascular diseases [2], the patients are stratified into 3 CVD risk categories including very high-risk, high risk and moderate risk for future adverse events. Very-high risk group (10-year risk of CVD death >10%) include individuals with DM and cardiovascular diseases (CVD), or DM with target organ damage, such as proteinuria or renal failure (estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) <30 mL/min/1.73 m2), patients with DM with three or more major risk factors, or with a DM duration of >20 years, and Type1 DM at the age of 40 years with early onset (i.e. 1-10 years of age) and particularly female. Patients of the young age (<35 years) with type1 DM of short duration (<10 years), and patients with T2 DM aged <50 years with a DM duration of <10 years and without major risk factors, are at moderate risk (<5% 10 year risk of CVD).

Yet, the most of the patients remains to the high risk group (10 year risk of CVD death 5-10%) consisting of patients with DM of more than 10 years and without previous CVD, without target organ damage and with at least one additional risk factor including age, hypertension, dyslipidemia, smoking and obesity [3]. According to the guidelines [2], the screening of these patients remains challenging as the guidelines only recommended resting ECG (Class I), whereas noninvasive functional imaging (radionuclide myocardial perfusion imaging, magnetic resonance imaging, or physical or pharmacological stress echocardiography) or CT angiography imaging may only be considered (Class IIb) in asymptomatic high-risk patients. In addition, the only other Class I recommendation refers to routine assessment of microalbuminuria as an indicator of risk of developing renal dysfunction or future CVD.

The addition of circulating biomarkers for CV risk assessment has limited clinical value and is not recommended by the guidelines (Class III) [2,3]. The reason for this suggestion is in the fact that in asymptomatic patients with DM, measurement of C-reactive protein or fibrinogen provides only minor incremental value to current risk assessment [2,3]. The addition of hsTnT to conventional risk factors has not shown incremental discriminative power in this group [3]. In individuals with type1 DM, elevated hsTnT was an independent predictor of renal decline and CV events [4], whereas prognostic value of N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) in an unselected cohort of people with DM (including known CVD) showed that patients with low levels of NT-proBNP (<125pg/mL) have an excellent short-term prognosis [5]. Therefore, and despite some prognostic significance, routine clinical assessment of cardiac biomarkers is not recommended for CVD risk stratification in any patient group with DM [2].

Similarly, and once popular in risk evaluation, carotid ultrasound intima-media thickness should not be recommended for screening CV risk [2], whereas assessment of carotid and/ or femoral plaque burden with arterial ultrasonography should be consider as risk modifier in asymptomatic patients with DM. So, arterial ultrasonography remains one of the imaging tests that should be performed in asymptomatic patients with DM not for stratification but comprehensive consideration in diagnostic algorithm.

Non-invasive estimation of the atherosclerotic burden, based on the coronary artery calcium score, can also be performed in asymptomatic patients for the risk assessment. In fact, patients with DM have a higher prevalence of coronary artery calcification compared to non-DM individuals [6] a CAC score of 0 (Agatston score) is associated with favorable prognosis, whereas incremental coronary artery calcium score from 1-99 (minimal to mild), 100- 399 (moderate), and ≥400 (severe calcification) is associated with a substantial higher relative risk of mortality of 25-33% [3]. Therefore, coronary artery calcium score may be considered by the guidelines [2] as a risk modifier in CV assessment in asymptomatic patients with moderate risk.

The most of the controversies and challenges regarding diagnosis of CAD in asymptomatic patients carries evaluation of myocardial ischemia with noninvasive functional testing and/ or noninvasive imaging of coronary arteries. Stress testing with myocardial perfusion imaging or stress echocardiography allows the detection of myocardial ischemia, particularly silent form which is more prevalent in patients with DM [7-9]. Randomized trials evaluating the impact of routine screening for CAD in asymptomatic DM and no history of CAD have shown no differences in the outcome (cardiac death and unstable angina) in those who underwent stress testing or CT angiography, or not [9-13]. In fact, four randomized trials (DIAD, DYNAMIT, FACTOR-64, DADDY-D) [9,11-13] including form 520 up to 1123 patients have shown no significant decrease in the rate of cardiac events, except for the last DADDY-D study [13] that demonstrated significant decrease in cardiac events in the subgroup of patients over 60 years undergoing routine exercise stress testing. In addition, study by Faglia et al. [14] using also exercise stress testing or stress echocardiography also demonstrated better outcome in patients undergoing functional testing for myocardial ischemia. Taken together, the studies showed obvious disparities in the testing modality, patient population, the rate of invasive coronarography following positive testing (15-93%!), treatment strategy following testing (usually left to discretion of the treating physician), whereas the annual rate of major adverse cardiac events was very low ranging from 0.6-1.9%. In fact, this rate annual rate of adverse events correspondents to moderate to high risk group of asymptomatic patients with DM.

In addition, a meta-analysis including 3299 asymptomatic subjects with DM showed that non-invasive imaging for CAD did not significantly reduce event rates of non-fatal MI (relative risk 0.65; p=0.062) and hospitalization for HF (relative risk 0.61; p=0.1) [10]. Accordingly, routine screening of CAD in asymptomatic DM is not recommended [2]. However, CTCA or functional imaging (radionuclide myocardial perfusion imaging, stress cardiac magnetic resonance imaging, or exercise or pharmacological stress echocardiography) may be considered in asymptomatic (presumable high risk) patients with DM for screening of CAD (Class IIb), whereas stress testing or CT angiography may be indicated in very high-risk asymptomatic individuals (with peripheral arterial disease (PAD), a high CAC score, proteinuria, or renal failure) [2,15].

2019 ESC guidelines for management and treatment of patients with chronic coronary syndrome [16], proposed unique diagnostic algorithm guiding revascularization in patients with anginal symptoms, and without any relevant differences for patients with diabetes. In brief, myocardial revascularization is now strongly based on functional evaluation of coronary stenosis, unless coronary stenosis is critical defined as more than 90% luminal stenosis, or in case or poor left ventricular ejection fraction (EF<35%). In addition, in case of clear previous evidence of myocardial ischemia correspondent to the territory with intermediate coronary lesions revascularization is indicated, however in patients with multivessel coronary artery stenoses, invasive functional testing is warranted and should be performed to interrogate each coronary lesion of intermediate significance. Regarding invasive functional parameters, the guidelines recommend both fractional flow reserve (FFR) or instantaneous wave-free flow reserve (iFR) with cut-off points of 0.80 and 0.89, respectively, and without any particular notion about possible interaction in patients with diabetes, or differences between FFR and iFR. In fact, previous large randomized studies (FAME, iFR SwedeHeart, Define Flair) have shown no difference in the outcome between patients with and without DM [17-19].

To read more about this article...Open access Journal of Public Health & Epidemiology

Please follow the URL to access more information about this article

To know more about our Journals....Iris Publishers

To know about Open Access Publishers

Iris Publishers- Open access Journal of Public Health & Epidemiology | The Inside Story of Coronavirus Pandemic

 


Authored by Ricardo Gobato*

Abstract

Coronavirus are RNA virus of the order of the Nidovirales of the family Coronaviridae. The average incubation period for coronavirus infection is 5 days, with an interval that can reach up to 16 days. Influenza H1N1, H5N1, Sars, Mers, Ebola, Coronavirus, are all zoonotic viruses, that is, they have been transmitted to humans by animals. For data on the number of infected 83000, 151767, 167518 and 173344 on March 1, 16, 18 and 19, 2020, respectively, released by WHO (World Health Organization), the number of dead d and infected i confirmed according to the data released daily on the network, rises exponentially to the initial do of dead and io infected initially confirmed, d = do.e0.049.t and i = io.e0.0409.t, respectively, where t is equal to the number of days, for t = 1 to n. Although the development and production of the potential vaccine has been incredibly rapid, its evaluation will take considerable time. All participants will be followed for 12 months after the second dose to collect the data that researchers initially need to find out if it is safe and effective.

Introduction

Coronavirus are RNA virus of the order of the Nidovirales of the family Coronaviridae. The subfamily consists of four genera Alfacoronavirus, Betacoronavirus, Gammacoronavirus and Deltacoronavirus. Alfacoronaviruses and Betacoronaviruses only infect mammals. Gammacoronaviruses and Deltacoronaviruses infect birds and can also infect mammals. The coronavirus was isolated for the first time in 1937. However, it was in 1965 that the virus was described as coronavirus, due to the profile under microscopy, looking like a crown as proposed by Tyrrell as a new genus of virus [1-5].

The SARS-CoV, MERS-CoV and COVID-2019 virus are highly pathogenic Betacoronaviruses and responsible for causing respiratory and gastrointestinal syndrome. In addition to these three, there are four other types of coronavirus that can induce disease in the upper respiratory tract in immune compromised individuals, as well as affect children, young people and the elderly. All coronavirus that affect humans are of animal origin [1-5]. The average incubation period for coronavirus infection is 5 days, with an interval that can reach up to 16 days. The transmissibility of patients infected with SARSCoV is on average 7 days after the onset of symptoms. However, preliminary data from the new Coronavirus (COVID-19) suggests that transmission may occur, even without the appearance of signs and symptoms [1-5].

Development

So far, there is not enough information on how many days before the signs and symptoms that an infected person starts transmitting the virus. Influenza H1N1, H5N1, Sars, Mers, Ebola, Coronavirus, are all zoonotic viruses, that is, they have been transmitted to humans by animals.

The more people on the planet, the closer we are to living with each other. With a world population of 7.7 billion people and geometric growth, it means more people in smaller spaces, therefore, a greater risk of exposure to disease-causing pathogens. Currently, about three out of four new diseases are zoonotic.

Our worldwide demand for meat is increasing and animal production is expanding as different parts of the world enrich and develop a taste for a diet rich in animal protein. The world is more connected than ever, but we still don’t have a global health security system capable of responding to a threat at its source.

To contain the outbreak, it depends on the government of the country where it originated, and a failure is evident. The planet Earth has rich biological diversity and virus can cope in all types of ecosystems and climate; even they are able to survive through mutation [6-64].

According to Chinese scientists, the pangolin, a small mammal at risk of extinction, may be the animal that transmitted the new coronavirus to man. After testing about 1,000 samples of wild animals, the scientists determined that the genomes of the virus sequences in pangolins were 99% identical to those of the patients. On the basis of data on the number of infected persons 83000, 151767, 167518 and 173344 on March 1, 16, 18 and 19, 2020, respectively, released by WHO (World Health Organization).


The number of dead d and infected i confirmed according to the data released daily on the network, rises exponentially to the initial do of dead and io infected initially confirmed, Eq. (2) and Eq. (3), respectively, where t is equal to the number of days, for t = 1 to n, therefore, Under this situation, the dollar has soared high and stock exchanges are oscillating. There is rush on markets for financial security, where someone wins, someone loses. Money does not exist, only financial speculation, virtual numbers, where the one who commands is who is behind a keyboard, typing, manipulating, dictating the rules, of a virtual war for economic power. While the human population as mere spectators, manipulated, by the system of which they are part, are thrown from side to side, in the struggle for survival, in the face of the global system.

It is not feasible for the market to eliminate a population, because if it does, there is no consumption. It is not feasible to solve a problem, cure a disease, as the pharmaceutical giants are, the giants of manufactured products. The economy cannot stop; its flow must be continuous, in one direction, like entropy. The system must control the markets and the population. But in an economic versus bacteriological war, if the complete system loses control, the virus will dominate, but it will not eliminate the entire population, otherwise it will have no means to spread.

A vaccine has already been obtained and is being tested. The vaccine cannot cause Covid-19 and does not contain the virus, as is the case with some other vaccines. Instead, it contains a small piece of genetic code called mRNA, which scientists extracted from the virus and then expanded in the laboratory. In this case, the mRNA encodes the viral protein “spike”, which is vital for the coronavirus to gain access to human cells. The researchers hope that the vaccine will stimulate the immune system to attack the virus, preventing the development of the disease.

The mRNA-1723 vaccine was not tested in mice before the start of clinical trials in humans, an incredibly rare occurrence that has proved controversial. Some experts are insisting that the gravity and urgent need for the current situation justifies the move, while others are concerned that it could violate various ethical and safety standards and put study participants at greater than normal risk. Although the development and production of the potential vaccine has been incredibly rapid, its evaluation will take considerable time. All participants will be followed for 12 months after the second dose to collect the data that researchers initially need to find out if it is safe and effective.

Conclusion

For data on the number of infected 83000, 151767, 167518 and 173344 on March 1, 16, 18 and 19, 2020, respectively, released by WHO (World Health Organization), the number of dead d and infected i confirmed according to the data released daily on the network, rises exponentially to the initial do of dead and io infected initially confirmed, d = do.e0.049.t and i = io.e0.0409.t, respectively, where t is equal to the number of days, for t = 1 to n. A vaccine has already been obtained and is being tested. The vaccine cannot cause Covid-19 and does not contain the virus, as is the case with some other vaccines. Instead, it contains a small piece of genetic code called mRNA, which scientists extracted from the virus and then expanded in the laboratory. In this case, the mRNA encodes the viral protein “spike”, which is vital for the coronavirus to gain access to human cells. The researchers hope that the vaccine will stimulate the immune system to attack the virus, preventing the development of the disease.

To read more about this article...Open access Journal of Public Health & Epidemiology

Please follow the URL to access more information about this article

To know more about our Journals....Iris Publishers

To know about Open Access Publishers

Tuesday, January 26, 2021

Iris Publishers- Open access Journal of Gynecology & Womens Health | Pregnancy Treatment in Covid-19 Pandemic: General Considerations

 


Authored by Eduardo Félix Martins Santana*

Editorial

The recent COVID-19 pandemic turned the obstetric scientific community on alert, since the information available during pregnancy is still limited [1]. Chinese data seems to demonstrate that symptoms during pregnancy would be similar to those of general population - fever, cough, dyspnoea, and asthenia. It is important to note that most of time; the symptoms (when present) will be mild and similar to “flu” [2].

The severity of cases is linked to serious respiratory impairment, once pregnant women have decreased residual pulmonary capacity, with a dropping “reserve” and increased rate of oxygen consumption, which generates tendency to hypoxia [2].

In fact, there is no specific treatment for COVID-19. Proposed treatments are being analysed over the days. The main action is clinical support during pregnancy. Antibiotics are indicated in cases when secondary bacterial infection involvement is suspected or confirmed, or even when it cannot be ruled out.

Antibiotic protocols proposed for treating pneumonia in pregnancy classically include the use of beta lactams (3rd generation cephalosporin) with association of a macrolide (clarithromycin or azithromycin). This can be scaled according to the patient’s clinical situation and antibiogram [3]. The use of Oseltamivir 75mg is also indicated for all cases of flu syndrome in all risk populations, such as pregnant women [3].

Hydroxychloroquine is an approved medication for malaria treatment and rheumatological disorders and is also approved in pregnancy. Initial studies have shown a possible action of this medication against COVID-19, but its use is being classified by societies of infectious diseases as “experimental rescue”, therefore, must be restricted to critically ill patients within clinical protocols approved by ethics committees. Its routine or prophylactic use in just confirmed cases is not recommended [4-6].

Fluids infusion is an integral part of treatment for sepsis, especially when hypotension (systolic blood pressure <90) or hypo perfusion is present. The Sepse Surviving Campaign recommends an initial bolus of 30ml/Kg, which in pregnancy can be “too much” because of the reduction in colloid osmotic pressure and the tendency to leak into the third space, worsening ventilator parameters. It seems reasonable to infuse 1-2 litres of crystalloid solution in septic and hypotensive pregnant women. In addition, only half of septic patients are “fluid responders” - justifying conservative fluid management [7].

If patient remains hypotensive (medium arterial pressure less than 60mmHg) despite volume resuscitation, the use of vasopressors is indicated. In pregnancy, noradrenaline is the vasopressor of choice and its use should not be delayed [7].

Fetal gas exchange depends on two variables - maternal PaO2/PaCO2 and utero-placental flow. Our efforts should focus on maintaining a maternal PaO2> 70mmHg, which would be equivalent to a saturation ≥ 95% and sufficient for adequate fetal oxygenation. The gasometry of a pregnant woman usually presents changes secondary to the increase in tidal volume - pH 7.40-7.47 (tendency to respiratory alkalosis) due to a drop in maternal PCO2 around 30mmHg. The drop in maternal PCO2 and the maintenance of placental uterine flow are the main responsible for fetal CO2 clearance [7].

The concept of fetal viability is the gestational age which the new-born has more than 50% chance of survival and at least 50% of the survivors present no severe long-term squeal. Below fetal viability (24 to 26 weeks) only fetal beats auscultation may suffice. After this period, more detailed evaluation using ultrasound and Doppler is desirable, with frequency of revaluation depending on fetal maternal condition [8].

COVID 19 infection is not an isolated indication for early delivery. Delivery may be necessary in those patients with progressive clinical worsening. The route must follow obstetric indications, since there is no evidence until this moment of caesarean section benefit in women with COVID infection19. This may be necessary in critically ill patients, especially those on mechanical ventilation [2]. Between 24 - 26 weeks to 34 weeks, if delivery is necessary, consider the possibility of corticotherapy and magnesium sulphate infusion for fetal neuroprotection [2].

To read more about this article....Open access Journal of Gynecology & Womens Health

Please follow the URL to access more information about this article

To know more about our Journals....Iris Publishers

To know about Open Access Publishers

Iris Publishers-Open access Journal of Biology & Life Sciences | Climate Change and its Impact on the Agricultural Sector

  Authored by  Zakaria Fouad Fawzy*, Abstract The agricultural sector is one of the sectors that will be negatively affected by this phenome...