Wednesday, May 15, 2019

Iris Publishers- Open access Journal of Agriculture and Soil Science | Trends in Soil Measurement Performance of Australasian Laboratories by Methods and Time 


Authored by George E Raymentc
 
This paper describes Australasian soil-measurement performance using data from inter-laboratory soil proficiency programs of the Australasian Soil and Plant Analysis Council Inc. Rapid assessments focused only on grand median percent robust coefficients of variation (%CVs) from 2004-05 through to 2014-15 inclusive, where grand medians by method were calculated across 12 soil samples annually. The %CV data were subdivided into three groupings (2005-2008, 2009-2012, 2013-2015). For 19 soil tests, CVs declined from 12.8% to 10.6% to 8.8%, suggestive of small improvements in measurement quality with time. Detailed assessments used data from 2009-10 to 2014-15 and included tests regulated for use in “reef catchments” of North-east Australia. Relationships between median-concentrations and associated robust %CVs were initially assessed with power-functions, with each subsequently solved for realistic analyte levels. Predicted trends for each method for the six years were then plotted. From these, soil tests with most variation were Total P, Bray-1P and Acid P. The findings confirm improvements are needed before between-laboratories’ measurement uncertainties for the “reef-preferred” Acid P soil test approach those for Olsen-P, Colwell-P and Mehlich-3P. Also, measurement improvements across the six years for Mehlich-3 P exceeded those of the other empirical soil P tests. Measurements of Walkley-Black Organic C were disappointing in 2009-10 but improved to 2014-15. By 2014-15, soil P tests with lowest to highest predicted robust %CVs were Mehlich-3 , Olsen P, Colwell P, Acid P and Bray-1P, respectively. On this evidence, regulators should be more flexible when specifying preferred diagnostic soil P tests for use on sugarcane farms in “reef catchments.
Successive Australian and Queensland Governments for over 25 years have made policy commitments to protect The Great Barrier Reef and its Marine Park from adverse downstream effects of land uses in the river catchments of eastern Queensland that drain to the Coral Sea. The nutrients nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P) have attracted close attention, including when used in fertilizers to grow sugarcane on around 400,000 ha of coastal soils.
Nowadays, N and P fertilizer used for sugarcane in “reef catchments” is regulated by the Queensland Government through its Environmental Protection Act 1994 [the Act] and Environmental Protection Regulation 2008; current as at 27 November 2015. Associated documentation titled “Reef Water Quality – Farming in Reef Catchments” (Environment and Heritage Protection 2016) specifies use of four soil tests to guide N and P fertilizer recommendations for plant crops of sugarcane, those being (i) Walkley and Black Organic C; (ii) Acid (BSES) P; (iii) Colwell P (when soils are alkaline); and (iv) Phosphate Buffer Index (with Colwell P). All of these plus other mentioned soil tests are described and coded byAlso specified in the Reef Water Quality documentation is a requirement that “suitable laboratories performing the chemical analysis of soil samples are required to participate in Australasian Soil and Plant Analysis Council Inc (ASPAC) proficiency trials and maintain certification for the nominated methods where available”.
 
To read more about this article...Journal of Agriculture and Soil Science 
 
Please follow the URL to access more information about this article
 
 
To know more about journals... Iris Publishers

No comments:

Post a Comment

Iris Publishers-Open access Journal of Hydrology & Meteorology | Influence of Community Resilience to Flood Risk and Coping Strategies in Bayelsa State, Southern Nigeria

  Authored by  Nwankwoala HO *, Abstract This study is aimed at assessing the influence of community resilience to flood risk and coping str...